Hero Takes A Fall
The
history of the St. Patrick's Battalion might have made an interesting movie
In
1846,
It's a great setup, isn't it?
Religious prejudice, immigrant bashing, a sweeping global canvas, and it's all
based on a true story to boot. Throw in some Hollywood-style romance, and you
might think that One Man's Hero would be an Oscar-winner in the making.
Perhaps it would be if it had been handled with any kind of flair or anchored
around a charismatic star.
Instead, we get the direction of
Lance Hool (producer of the big-screen Flipper and McHale's Navy)
and a lead performance by Tom Berenger (who also served as coproducer). Not
that Berenger's completely incapable of being charismatic; he excels in
dumb-fun actioners such as The Substitute -- provided he gets to beat up
a lot of people and generally keep his mouth shut. Forcing him to emote,
however, is a risk. Forcing him to emote while wearing fake sideburns, a
televangelist hairdo, and an absurdly fake Irish accent? Suicidal.
(In all fairness, he does ditch the fake sideburns halfway through.) Playing
American deserter Sergeant John Riley, Berenger seems to have modeled himself
on Mel Gibson in Braveheart (he gets to make impassioned speeches about
freedom while a rousing instrumental score tries to compensate for his lack of
emotion), but he comes closer to Kevin Costner's sleepwalking rendition of
Robin Hood. He's eminently passable as a soldier in the heat of battle, but the
forced romantic scenes (with Mexican TV star Daniela Romo) are initiated with
the line, "You're more woman than any woman I've ever known," and go
downhill from there.
It's not all his fault, though.
Director Hool is apparently under the impression that a soaring soundtrack is
all an audience needs in order to be moved, and screenwriter Milton S. Gelman seems
to be writing military strategy rather than a script. (1. Have the characters
move one place. 2. Then another. 3. Then somewhere else. Who cares why they do
it? Just get them there.) Admittedly, there's not a lot of room to play with
historical fact, but trying to understand the motivations of the characters
would be a good start.
When the movie begins,
Berenger's Sergeant Riley is listening to imprisoned Irish soldiers complain
about religious discrimination and telling them to get used to it. He then goes
to a superior officer to ask permission to go to Mass, even though that will
mean attending a Mexican church. His superiors grudgingly allow it. While at
the church, Riley sees other members of his squad, whom he promptly turns in
for not having asked permission to go. When these men are punished, Riley gets
mad because the punishment is unduly harsh (he couldn't have seen that coming,
given the relentless religious discrimination?) and breaks all the men out,
running away with them across the Mexican border. Why now? What makes this the
breaking point? Berenger's stone face offers no clues, and neither does the
script. Just get them to
The meat of the story, of
course, is in Riley and company's formation of the San Patricios, a
special battalion for Irish deserters that would fight alongside the Mexican
army in exchange for citizenship. Unfortunately, Hool decides to waste our time
with a contrived love triangle involving Riley, bandit-turned-soldier Cortina
(Joaquim de Almeida), and Cortina's girlfriend, Marta (Romo). Whereas most
directors would have ended the story shortly after the San Patricios
heroically fight their last great battle against suicidal odds, Hool keeps on
going. And going. Riley survives execution and prison;
he has to conclude the love-triangle story, no matter how long it takes. Even
when that seems to be resolved, a voice-over narration, heretofore unheard,
suddenly kicks in to read us about a paragraph's worth of summation and
speculation about Riley's final fate. You'll be long past caring by then.