<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VVM &#8220;pwned&#8221; by New Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/</link>
	<description>The official website of Luke Y. Thompson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LYT</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12162</link>
		<dc:creator>LYT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12162</guid>
		<description>Ain&#039;t no little guys in corporate mergers, condiment.

It&#039;s a victory for me, though. And having spent half my income this year on surgery bills, I could use one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ain&#8217;t no little guys in corporate mergers, condiment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a victory for me, though. And having spent half my income this year on surgery bills, I could use one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: condiment</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12161</link>
		<dc:creator>condiment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12161</guid>
		<description>In other words, NT&#039;s investment bankers beat up VVM&#039;s investment bankers. Not precisely a victory for the little guy, dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, NT&#8217;s investment bankers beat up VVM&#8217;s investment bankers. Not precisely a victory for the little guy, dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LYT</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12160</link>
		<dc:creator>LYT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12160</guid>
		<description>Actually it was more like them, and them, they fighted, and people thought they knew whowouldwin, but were wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it was more like them, and them, they fighted, and people thought they knew whowouldwin, but were wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ku Feng</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ku Feng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12159</guid>
		<description>Did the New Times ambush the Village Voice Media from all sides?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the New Times ambush the Village Voice Media from all sides?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean (connery)</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12158</link>
		<dc:creator>sean (connery)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12158</guid>
		<description>if you were really excited, you could even get away with &#039;totally pwnzzored&#039; but that might be going a bit to far.

totally cool news, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you were really excited, you could even get away with &#8216;totally pwnzzored&#8217; but that might be going a bit to far.</p>
<p>totally cool news, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED209</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12157</link>
		<dc:creator>ED209</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12157</guid>
		<description>VALLEYBEAT rocks up here in the SFV!  Though, not as extensive as CityBeat.  I think the OC Weekly and LA Weekly are both now with New Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VALLEYBEAT rocks up here in the SFV!  Though, not as extensive as CityBeat.  I think the OC Weekly and LA Weekly are both now with New Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaye</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12156</guid>
		<description>Awesome news... my fingers crossed for you, and the paper.  I have so missed New Times L.A.  City Beat is cool, but it&#039;s never been as satifying as NT was end to end.  NT even managed to get me to consistently read sections that I traditionally never bother with.  It&#039;s time the L.A. Weekly got a shake up.  It got better when some New Times refugees settled in there, but most of the time, it was only good for movie showtimes, and for writing phone numbers on, when randomly running into friends.  This is great news for the writers, the readers, and Los Angeles print media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome news&#8230; my fingers crossed for you, and the paper.  I have so missed New Times L.A.  City Beat is cool, but it&#8217;s never been as satifying as NT was end to end.  NT even managed to get me to consistently read sections that I traditionally never bother with.  It&#8217;s time the L.A. Weekly got a shake up.  It got better when some New Times refugees settled in there, but most of the time, it was only good for movie showtimes, and for writing phone numbers on, when randomly running into friends.  This is great news for the writers, the readers, and Los Angeles print media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12155</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12155</guid>
		<description>W00t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W00t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David N. Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12154</link>
		<dc:creator>David N. Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12154</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s &#039;pwned&#039;... look it up in Wikipedia. Hey, thass cool, LYT. Do they own the OC Weekly, too? You could hang with Commiegirl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s &#8216;pwned&#8217;&#8230; look it up in Wikipedia. Hey, thass cool, LYT. Do they own the OC Weekly, too? You could hang with Commiegirl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED209</title>
		<link>http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/comment-page-1/#comment-12153</link>
		<dc:creator>ED209</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lytrules.com/blog/2005/10/25/vvm-pwned-by-new-times/#comment-12153</guid>
		<description>&quot;pwned?&quot;  Pawned?  Or is it &quot;owned?&quot;  Typographical error, I think...

Though, &quot;pawned&quot; would be funny...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pwned?&#8221;  Pawned?  Or is it &#8220;owned?&#8221;  Typographical error, I think&#8230;</p>
<p>Though, &#8220;pawned&#8221; would be funny&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

