Comments on: TWILIGHT Zone-Out

By: juliet

juliet — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:35:02 +0000

the movie was fab but ofcourse the book was better.but we all watched it so wtf.robert pattinson is freakin hot and kristen stewart quite pretty.the plot was good and after reading the books i just wanna see the movies.there is not another young hollywood couple who could do it better.and yes ‘SHOW US MORE EDWARD’

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:18:37 +0000

show me edward

By: charmaine

charmaine — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:36:38 +0000

i love edward and bella.they are defenitely a couple.they are the best person i’ve ever saw in movie.i hope edward and bella will have their own personal email address so that they can send me email.my email address is hmchar@gmail.com thank u.

By: Lily

Lily — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:53:49 +0000

Actually, reading the book first makes the movie better. Trust me, after you’ve read any of the book, you’ll be grateful for the few things they’re able to do for the story in the movie.

By: Peggy C

Peggy C — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:07:27 +0000

But a mortal 30 year old looks like a 30 year old. This vampire dude became a vampire as a teen and apparently you hold your age when you get converted. So at least he doesn’t look so creepy with her.

And the Mormon church has a history of passing off their child brides to older men…gross as that is. I guess it can be considered common in some cultures–a man goes out and gets established, then once he has money and a home he takes a young, theoretically-fertile bride to start his clan.

By: Julie Scott

Julie Scott — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:53:32 +0000

I’m just saying… if a high school senior girl fell in love with a (apparently less than bright and immature) 30 year old going to her high school under a false identity, I don’t think anyone would think it was cute and romantic.

And I am sick to death of hearing a 107 year old vampire catagorized as a teenager. He might be a complete moron who is emotionally immature, but at 107 you no longer a teenager. Sorry, doesn’t work for me.

By: Peggy C

Peggy C — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:32:37 +0000

Yeah, but someone would eventually notice that he didn’t age and had been there for years.

So I had to go see it today with my little sister. It wasn’t as bad as I feared from your review, Luke. I think it was actually pretty standard teen “romance novel” level stuff. In adult romance novels, they do eventually have sex, so that’s the only thing missing in this one. Cheesiness is required in this format.

By: LYT

LYT — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:46:01 +0000

To be fair, Julie — she’s 17 in the movie (which is legal in some states) and the actress in real life is 18. That’s a bit better than 15.

I was gonna say the guy’s obliged to go to high school just to blend in — but unless he acts like an utter dunce, that cover would be blown after a year or two.

Actually, that’s not a bad premise for some other story right there — an immortal who acts retarded so he keeps being held back at school.

By: Julie Scott

Julie Scott — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:23:12 +0000

So far, most of the reviews I’ve seen have said that most fans of the book did not like the movie. So, that can’t be a good recommendation.

BTW you missed the dumbest premise of all – what sort of a masochist does a 100 year old vampire have to be to voluntarily go back to high school?? I mean, seriously, WTF? Also, speaking of pedeophiles, what about this 100 year old guy dating a 15 year old girl? (Especially a really tom-boyish looking girl) Talk about your pedeophilia! I mean, that’s a little creepy. Seriously.

By: Gaby

Gaby — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:04:00 +0000

This is by far the best review i’ve heard. XD
The movie is dumb and the books are dumber.. I went to see it for all of the eye-candy in it but most of the time I just ended up laughing about it with my friends